Idea tr
MCI(MCPEQ) - $8.10 on Mar 1, 2003 by charlie479
2010
2011
Price:
$8.10
EarningsPerShare:
Shares Outstanding (in M):
N/M
P/E:
Market Cap (in $M):
243
P/FCF:
Net Debt (in $M):
N/M
EBIT (in $M):
N/M
N/M
TEV (in $M):
N/M
TEV/EBIT:
bl br
Description tr
In the bankrupt rubble of Worldcom, there is a $750 million preferred stock issue called the MCI QUIPS (Ticker:  MCPEQ on the pink sheets).  Yes, pink sheet equities in bankrupt companies are worthless 99.9% of the time.  There are special features to the MCI QUIPS, however, and the MCI QUIPS are far from worthless.  I believe the MCI QUIPS will recover an amount much closer to their par value of $25.00 per share than their current market price of $8.10.  

MCI Communications Corporation was organized in 1968.  It grew to become the second largest long distance carrier in the United States and produced about $4 billion of annual EBITDA by 1998.

In 1996, the MCI QUIPS were issued by an entity called MCI Capital I.  MCI Capital I is a Delware trust that is wholly owned by MCI Communications Corporation.  MCI Capital I issued $750 mil of preferred securities in the form of 8% Cumulative Quarterly Income Preferred Securities (hence the QUIPS name).  MCI Capital I does not have any debt and has no other preferred stock besides the QUIPS.  Therefore, the QUIPS effectively represent the highest priority claim on the assets of MCI Capital I.  

What are the assets of MCI Capital I?  MCI Capital I holds $750 million of 8% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures which were issued by MCI Communications Corporation in 1996.  This is a typical “trust preferred” structure that allows the economic issuer (MCI Communications Corp in this case) to indirectly sell preferred stock to investors while getting a tax deduction on the associated interest expense that is paid to the trust.  MCI Communications is the legal obligor on $750 mil of debt held by MCI Capital I, which the QUIPS effectively own.

Two years after the MCI QUIPS were created, MCI Communications Corporation was acquired by Worldcom, Inc.  In the acquisition, MCI Communications Corporation was merged into a merger subsidiary of Worldcom and MCI became a wholly owned subsidiary of Worldcom.  Post acquisition, the assets of MCI Communications remained owned by MCI and its operating subsidiaries.  MCI Communications also continued to be the obligor on $2.59 billion of senior bonds that were issued prior to the merger and on the 8% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures held by MCI Capital I.  While Worldcom began to present MCI’s assets on a combined basis with its own assets for accounting purposes after the merger, it’s important to note that MCI’s assets remained legally separate from Worldcom’s.  The corporate structure left Worldcom as an equity holder of MCI, meaning that Worldcom bondholders (whose sole claims are at the parent company, Worldcom, as they do not have a guarantee from any of the subsidiaries) have no claim on MCI assets other than through Worldcom’s ownership of the MCI equity.  

Four years after its acquisition of MCI, Worldcom revealed a multi-billion dollar accounting fraud.  The fraud primarily involved improperly capitalized line costs during 2001 and 2002.  This eventually led the company to file for bankruptcy in July 2002.  On the petition date, Worldcom had consolidated debt of over $30 billion including unsecured bank debt and bonds issued by Worldcom, Inc.  While this is a staggering amount of total debt that dwarfs the current value of the assets, we need to concern ourselves only with the size of the MCI claims and its assets.

Under the US bankruptcy code, senior claims of an entity must be paid in full before junior claims receive any recovery.  In the case of MCI, the $2.59 billion of MCI bonds and the $750 mil of 8% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures must be fully satisfied before value from the MCI assets can be distributed via MCI’s equity to Worldcom bondholders.  The monthly operating reports being filed with the bankruptcy court indicate that current EBITDA is approximately $4 billion per year.  As debtors’ counsel has noted, substantially all of the cash flow generating assets are held by MCI and its subsidiaries.  With $4 bil of EBITDA being produced by MCI assets, we can therefore be comfortable that the asset value of MCI is enough to satisfy all of the MCI claims and, therefore, the QUIPS claim at MCI Capital I as well.  If the Worldcom bondholders expect any recovery (the current market value of the Worldcom bonds implies approximately a $6 bil recovery for them) from MCI’s assets, then those bondholders will have to confirm a plan of reorganization that either reinstates the MCI QUIPS or provides QUIPS holders with a full par recovery.
bl br
Catalyst tr
1.  Filing of a plan of reorganization in mid 2003.  
2.  Gradual public realization of structural seniority of the MCI QUIPS to the Worldcom bonds.
3.  Emergency from bankrutpcy
4.  Elimination of view of QUIPS as a tainted security when it moves off the pink sheets.
bl br
Messages tr
#
Author
Subject
Private
106
sparky371
Thanks
Thanks. That was my take too, but I'm no pro on this stuff. Thanks for the feedback. Sparky
105
matt366
Liquidation
Laughable. No shot. DoJ inquiry proceeding at snail's pace. VZ not even objecting in front of BK court. Company is coming out.
104
sparky371
Barrons-VZ threat?
Anyone want to comment on Barrons DC Current article mentioning VZ et al still hoping to last-minute force MCI into CH7/liquidation?
103
doggy835
Charlie
I'm a little more sparing in my praise. The original idea was well presented and ultimately shown to have merit. The early follow-up was detailed, but sometimes off target. Message #43, for example, claimed the books were clean and there were no well-documented intercompany payables. Oops. In Charlie's defense he did properly identify those statements as thirdhand and his discussion of the legal issues was always solid.

Things changed in mid-April. The best opportunities to profit came AFTER the re-org plan was filed. Yet after a helpful summary on 4/14 Charlie pretty much went silent. When a story takes such a dramatic turn I expect the idea's champion to follow through, explain what (if anything) has changed and provide new thoughts and info. Or at least explain why he's unwilling/unable to do so.

Rating Summary:
Initial idea - excellent
Initial followup - good
Subsequent followup - poor
102
max685
Charlie
I'd like to add my thanks as well. This was an intriguing, challenging, and ultimately profitable investment opportunity. I appreciate your initial work, as well as the ongoing updates.
101
pat110
Settlement
Charlie,

This one had some great twists and turns. I wish I were a better trader but did manage to do pretty well. It was a good learning experience --plus I got paid.

I am very glad they settled and did not take it into court. The unknown was those damm inter-company payables and royalties. Even if it did all stink, Gonzalez’s terse comments about the QUIPS and MCI trade group in May after the first hearing made me nervous.

I think the recent negative press on MCI and lawsuits helped push MCI toward settling.

Thanks again for uncovering this one even if it did keep me up a couple nights.

Pat
100
sparky371
congrats...
....on the Iron Hand on the Tiller. I'm glad it worked out for you and any other holders.
99
doggy835
45 cents
According to Bloomberg. Settlement at 3:45am.
98
sparky371
moment of truth?
BB reptg that Judge Gonzalez has given MCI and their dissident creditors, which I presume to mean QUIPS/Trade, until midnight tonight to settle their differences.
97
max685
Thanks, Doggy
This story certainly has taken some "interesting" turns. I have a small position in the QUIP's so I hope there's a decent resolution sooner rather than later, but the new fraud allegations are concerning -- and wonderful fodder for the competitors, of course.
96
doggy835
Re: latest scuttlebutt
QUIP attorneys at Kramer, Levin filed a docket early this week that, if you hold it sideways and squint through one eye, seems like it might imply settlement talks are about to begin.

The WCOM senior lenders really blew it. If they'd just paid the MCI creditors in full instead of trying to pull this substantive consolidation crap the state tax evasion scheme (yesterday's WSJ) never would have come to light. Now they've 50 states with budget deficits after them. It's one thing to be greedy, but to be both greedy and stupid.....

Keeping Bernie's legacy alive, I supppose.
95
max685
latest scuttlebutt
The QUIPS have been moving up. Are there some rumors floating about regarding a settlement?
94
doggy835
Settlement or appeal
Those are the only two hopes. And the only hope for settlement is the threat of appeal. It's extremly rare for an objecting creditor to get skunked in a large BK, so I expect a settlement. But I have no way to guess a dollar amount. Or cent amount, as the case may be...
93
max685
What next?
Is the confirmation hearing the last gasp? I'm surprised the QUIPS are trading as high as they are, given that they could be worth zero soon. Though I suppose it's possible that backroom negotiations are continuing and that there could still be a settlement. Does anyone have any insight?
92
pat110
doggy
I feel your pain doggy!

I bought into this thinking that the courts would be rational and honor the fact that MCI is a seperate entity. If this goes down as is .... it really sucks.
I guess the lesson I learned is you can't look totally at the laws ; you also have to have a good understanding of which players are represented when the plan is being crafting ... and, if you buy a security with no representation others might invent a way to screw you.... and the judge might just kick you in the ass to help you learn that lesson.

Is this happening in the US? Sounds like the process in some third world country.

Its not over but I sure don't like the way it seems to be setting up. I think there might be $10 here; but I doubt $15 to $18. It could also just as easily be $0. I don't like the zero part. I can go to vegas and get that kind of proposition.

I'd like to hear what Charlie thinks too.

Pat



91
doggy835
The pain intensifies
This idea won the $5K prize and is still on the highest rated and most active lists. So far we're down 68% (do I hear 100?). Either this has become the best investment opportunity of all time or we here at VIC are suckers.

In denying a separate trustee the judge rejected every point raised by MCI trade debt and MCPEQ. Then, for good measure, he accuses us of intentionally staying silent during the negotiation process so we could appear at the last minute and try to extort cash by threatening to throw a wrench in the works. He also goes overboard praising management's "extensive investigation" and "forthright evaluation" of these issues leading to an "informed conclusion". He doesn't explicity nominate Capellas for canonization, perhaps he's saving that for this week.

Is there a silver lining anywhere in this Cumulonimbus?
90
jim77
Judge rejects request
Central to the dispute is WorldCom's proposal to consolidate the estates of WorldCom's holding company and its MCI unit.

The debtor's disclosure statement and reorganization plan assert that substantive consolidation is necessary because of the impossibility of untangling more than $1 trillion in intercompany claims that WorldCom's many units hold against each other.

Under the plan, investors with trade claims at the MCI WorldCom Network Services subsidiary would receive about 36 cents on the dollar. Because of information in bond indentures and obtained through discovery, they say they are structurally senior and should receive 100% recovery.

MCI subordinated noteholders would receive nothing under the plan. They argue that since their claims are against MCI, where they say 90% to 95% of WorldCom's value resides, they should also receive 100%. The investors point to WorldCom holding company bondholders, who are farther from the assets in the corporate structure yet get about 36 cents on the dollar.

MCI's senior bondholders, by comparison, get 80 cents on the dollar.

Weisfelner and Mayer said the consolidation improperly diverts $3 billion in value from MCI creditors. The lawyers allege that the debtor didn't adequately consider fairer alternatives and left decisions about recoveries to vocal claimants with large pieces of WorldCom holding company debt to expedite the process.

Counsel for WorldCom said the parties' complaints were really about the outcome of the plan, and not the way the plan was created.

"They have their remedies," said Goldstein, explaining that dissenters could object to or vote against the proposal.

Weisfelner said that a report from FTI Consulting, the forensic accountant for the creditors committee, suggested that a three-way consolidation would cut through much of the uncertainty about the intercompany claims. Under this method, he said, MCI would owe WorldCom a net of $24 billion in intercompany claims, $19.5 billion of which are royalty fees.

The lawyer said the royalty fees were for items like the benefit of the WorldCom name among other matters, and argued that they would not hold up in court.

Lawyers for the debtor and the committee questioned the committee's evidence and motives.

"The conclusions came before the analysis," said Doug Maynard of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, a lawyer for the unsecured committee, explaining that the movants decided what result they wanted and then tailored their discovery to the end.

Several lawyers argued that advisors to WorldCom and the committee had grappled with the claims for six months, and rightly concluded that they could not be reconciled.
89
jim77
Judge rejects request
Judge rejects request for MCI trustee
by Chris Nolter 16, May 2003


One the eve of WorldCom Inc.’s disclosure statement hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Arthur Gonzalez denied the request of two creditor groups to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee to serve as a fiduciary for the telecom's MCI Group subsidiary.

The ruling, laid out in a 25-page decision issued late Friday, May 16, addresses the most contentious dispute among claim holders in the telecom's mammoth bankruptcy filing.

Two groups of investors holding claims against the debtors' MCI subsidiary had asked Gonzalez to appoint a limited-purpose Chapter 11 trustee for the unit. The creditors, who have attacked WorldCom's efforts to substantively consolidate the estates of MCI and WorldCom, allege that there is no fiduciary looking out for MCI and its creditors.

On Friday, however, Gonzalez ruled that the creditors did not meet the standard for cause and that their objections would be more appropriate at WorldCom’s confirmation hearing.

The judge noted that appointing a trustee would be an event of default under WorldCom’s debtor-in-possession credit facility. He also said the delay to the reorganization would be “substantial” and would “seriously and adversely” affect the debtor.

“We’re extremely disappointed by the court’s conclusion, and we’ll consider all of our appellate rights," said Ed Weisfelner of law firm Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP, which represents a group of distressed investors who purchased claims in the MCI WorldCom Network Services unit.

WorldCom’s disclosure statement hearing is scheduled for Monday, May 19. The debtor will face objections from the MCI creditors, regional Bells, AT&T Corp., state attorneys general and several other parties.

Gonzalez took a day to issue his decision following an eight-hour hearing Thursday in which the parties made their arguments until 10 p.m. EDT.

Speaking at the hearing, Weisfelner listed several reasons for appointing a trustee.

The lawyer argued that the debtors had disregarded several sections of the bankruptcy code by abdicating their fiduciary responsibility to MCI and improperly soliciting votes for the plan. He also asserted, among other things, that they failed to hold a substantive consolidation hearing and did not consider less-harmful approaches to consolidating the various bankruptcy estates.

"The irony of getting ripped off" by the fiduciaries of WorldCom is "unbearable," Weisfelner said at the hearing, alluding to the prepetition fraud allegedly perpetrated by the company's former management.

Thomas Moers Mayer of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel to a group of MCI subordinated noteholders that includes some small investors, voiced similar arguments.

Marcia Goldstein of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP derided the accusatory tone of the two lawyers at the hearing, pointing to WorldCom's achievements in corporate governance since filing for bankruptcy protection eight months ago. Goldstein said that words such as "theft" and "flagrant disregard" were used to "dress up" complaints stemming from poor investment decisions.

The lawyer also warned that assigning a trustee would delay the reorganization and provide ammunition to competitors such as Verizon Communications Corp., which has petitioned federal regulators to liquidate WorldCom.




88
pat110
To little to late
Judge Gonzalez denied both motions for a trustee / or alternatively an examainer -- to late he says ; not a mistake by the quips and trade claims; just a calculated risk to not raise issues before. Slammed it pretty good.

I guess the risk reward was with the MCI bonds.
87
sparky371
Judge Gonzalez
Am being told that while he has not ruled, his comments suggest the motion will likely be denied.
bl br